[BNomic-Public] Miniplayers
Glotmorf
glotmorf@earthlink.net
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 01:48:35 -0400
On 8/30/02 at 8:07 PM Wonko wrote:
>I had an idea: What if we allowed people to join the game not as full
>players, but as 'miniplayers' - people who could only do things like run
>around on the Grid, buy stocks, etc. So people who like the idea of the
>Grid
>could do the Grid thing, but they wouldn't have to worry about making
>proposals or voting on things. For them, the Grid IS the game. For us,=
they
>provide a way of making the Grid more interesting. Also, if they can use
>the
>Stock Market, then they can provide that randomness we were talking about=
-
>if three dozen people are buying and selling stock, no single player can
>exert too much influence, but the prices can still be based on how well
>they
>sell.
>
>
>Is this a good idea, or am I nuts?
>I suppose those aren't mutually exclusive conditions, are they?
You're not nuts, or at least not in this respect. uin had a similar idea=
with...what did he call them? "Disinterested" players? People who didn't=
participate in the grid, weren't subject to the sushi or gremlins or=
anything like that, that only were involved in proposals, voting and=
judging. I was against it at the time because it amounted to him=
affecting the game but not being affected by it, which I found=
objectionable.
What you're suggesting is the crystallization of subsets of the game as=
games in their own right, with a policy-making layer over top...sort of=
like if the management of neopets.com was a nomic game. Interesting idea,=
but wouldn't it take rather a lot of work to make the subgames something=
people would want to play in their own right? At the moment, neither grid=
football nor gremball are up to the standards of average pbm games...
Glotmorf