[Bnomic-private] it's all gone to HELL

bd bdonlan@maine.rr.com
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:10:37 -0400


On Thursday 22 August 2002 09:05 am, Wonko wrote:
> Quoth Baron von Skippy,
>
> >> I issue, retroactively, and in blatant defiance of "Thou Shalt Not S=
crew
> >> With Time," Writs of Delay, one per day for every day of the past we=
ek
> >> (not nweek).
> >
> > -[[Do the rules say you're subject to them?]]-
>
> The rules say that everyone's subject to them, but I'm not about to obj=
ect
> to the admin's actions. And if nobody objects, the Statute of Limitatio=
ns
> brings the game back to where it would be if it had been legal. Wheee!
>
> And if anyone does object, I will personally propose to kick the shit o=
ut
> of them.

[[ Must......... Resist......... ]]

> >> I've moved again, I'm on a dialup, I'm broke, I'm homeless, I'm hung=
ry,
> >> I'm pissed. I've got things on my mind right now that I consider to =
be
> >> far more important than this game (apologies to Glotmorf, who seems =
to
> >> either have a slavish devotion or WAY too much time on eir hands :).
> >
> > -[[We need to get that whole thing about Respecting the Admin worked
> > out...]]-
>
> Don't we have it worked out? I mean, it's not actually written in the
> ruleset anywhere, but that doesn't mean we can't have respect for the a=
dmin
> anyway. I have tremendous respect for Dave - he's kept the game running=
 all
> this time despite the ever-increasing complexity of the ruleset, and I
> don't think any of the rest of us could do that half as well as Dave do=
es.
> Sure, r0 says we can deal with the sudden abscence of our admin, but I
> really don't think we could - none of us could do what Dave does. Don't=
 get
> me wrong - I'm not belittling all us players, but the things Dave has d=
one
> to keep this game going are frankly astounding.
>
> We don't need the ruleset to tell us to respect em. We already do.

--=20
bd
The above =3D=3D my from field. Duh.