[Bnomic-private] Judgement on CFI 977

[Joshua Caudle]

I judge False on CFI 977.

Analysis:  In part A Orc attempts to resaon that because f the inclusivity
of the language provided by rule 503,  rule 636 has no application, however,
rule 33 states "each rule has an attribute called Chutzpah, which is a
positive integer, in the event of a conflict between two or more rules, the
tiule with the highest Chutzpah takes precedence." therefore since  rule 636
has a chutzpah of 2 and rule 503 only has a chutzpah of 1. it is illegal to
remove from players items in eir possession. this therefore makes all other
parts of said arguement moot.

However:
I myself am placing a call for inquiry on this same action.

Statement: Any player according to the rulset as of nweek 22 nday 5 may
drinka glass of Champagne by simply announcing that the action in taking
place in a public forum. if no particular glass is stated in said
proclamation, the admistrator must choose an otherwise unclaimed glasss of
Champagne for the player to drink. If no such glasses exist the
administrator must create said glass.

Argument:
Rule 503 in nweek 22 does not state that a glass must be in a player's
possesion inorder for the player to drink said glass. However since Rule 636
has greater Chutzpah athan Rule 503 the glass cannot be in the possession of
another player. Therefore it si the duty of the adminisytrator to selecta
legal glass for consumption as stated in Rule 25. If no appropiate glasses
are currently available, Rule 25 would also plae the onus of creating said
glass on the administrator.